Jump Ball

President Donald and Dictator Kim jump ball at nuclear summit by @danyoura at http://TrumpToon.com  #TrumpKimSummit #TrumpKim

Peace Bomb

Glenn Checks Out Nuclear Fallout

Order POSTERS . . . DOWNLOADS . . . STORE

Glenn checks out nuclear fallout in Mt. Vernon, his home town in Washington State. Click on Glenn

Questions for Government, Nuclear Scientists and Media

Questions for Government, Nuclear Experts and Media
From Dan Youra, author of RadiationSurvivor.com

I have a few questions for you government officials, nuclear experts, thousands of reporters and editors from all major media corporations throughout the world concerning the unending barrage of reports you are spinning out on the radiation from the exploded nuclear reactors in Fukushima, Japan.

You drum it into our numbed brains that the levels of radiation from the world’s most damaged nuclear complex are low, minuscule, tiny, safe, not harmful to humans, below acceptable limits and within safety margins.

QUESTION: Andy, at what point precisely will we know that the radiation levels have moved from your low and safe levels to the not-so-low and not-so-safe levels?

We, John Q and Joanie Q Publics, can’t miss the point which you hammer home regularly in your briefings and broadcasts that we live everyday with benign background radiation from microwave ovens, bricks and stars.

QUESTION: Are you telling me that breathing a tiny particle of uranium into my lung is not as dangerous to my health as sniffing a brick?

We hear you say that background radiation doesn’t hurt us, but my dermatologist tells me to cover my body and wear my baseball cap when I am outdoors in the background radiation?

QUESTION: Dr. Regina, how many human beings does the Surgeon General’s office say get skin cancer from the sun each year and, thus, die from background radiation?

Excuse me for pointing out that the EPA hasn’t been real clear on the cumulative nature of radiation. I’m learning that it sneaks in through my nose and lodges in my lungs. It gurgles in my gut. And, it pours through my pores.

QUESTION: Ms. Jackson, at what point do all your low, minuscule, tiny, safe, not harmful, acceptable, within limits add up in my body to “Woops! too much, too late, too bad?”

Would 2 months of tiny equal too late? Five months? Five years?

You report that the nuclear mess may take years or decades to clean up? One of your experts projects that you’ll need 50 to 100 years to clean this up.

QUESTION: Would a few decades of low, minuscule amounts accumulate in a child’s body to equal too much, too late?

Pardon us not-so-educated readers and viewers for being ignorant about the meaning of the many scientific terms used to measure levels of radiation.

QUESTION: Mr. Holdren, is there anyone among you who is a Jargon Czar, who can explain the esoteric world of radiation measurement to us: Rems, millirems, Sieverts (Sv), milliSieverts, microSierverts, Roentgen (R), Gray (Gy), Rad, Curie (Ci), millicurie, microcurie, picocurie, becquerel (Bq), coulomb/kilogram (C/kg), microcoulombs/kilogram (µC/kg), Common Units and SI units?

Officials at Fukushima’s wrecked reactors report that radiation levels in the waste water are 1,000 milleSieverts. A Wall Street Journal articles reports that the recording devices used to monitor the radiation at the plant only goes up to 1,000 milleSieverts.

QUESTION: Mr. TEPCO, if you were to travel to the sun with my backyard thermometer that goes up to 100 degrees F to measure the temperature of the sun, how hot will you tell me the sun is? 100 degrees F, right? So, how much higher above 1,000 milleSieverts is the radiation really? You don’t know, do you? How do you know it’s safe? You don’t, do you? You’re guessing, I mean, hoping, right?

We read your reports one day that sea water is 750 times more radioactive than normal, then 7,500 times beyond safe, then 75,000 times off the charts. We hear you tell us that these levels are safe.

QUESTION: , Mr. Prime Minister, could you please tell us what level is NOT SAFE? 750,000 times? 7.5 million? 7.5 billion?

If the radiation gets to 7.5 billion, is the government going to raise the safe level to 7.5 trillion times? 

You can’t blame us – the public – for being a bit confused about how you determine the line between low and high, safe and dangerous, acceptable and intolerable.

QUESTION: Can you tell us how many Curies we can breath, how many coulomb/kilogram we can eat and how many Rems or Sieverts we can absorb through our skin before we are cursed with radiation poisoning and cast into a fate of painful, nuclear death?

You’d agree that the half life thing about radioactive particles is a little tricky to grasp. We hear you assure us that Iodine-131 degrades very fast and disappears in a few days, whereas plutonium hangs out for a few billion years.

QUESTION: Larry, What is the difference between the death caused by a speedy radionuclide, Iodine-131 for example, and a slow dying radionuclide, say plutonium 238?

Fukushima operators can’t find a safe place to store the radioactive waste water. The temptation is great to dump it into the ocean, and, as your reporting assures us, the ocean is a big place and the radiation will dissipate rapidly and its effects will be harmless on sea life and humans.

QUESTION: Brian, what does General Electric tell NBC to tell you to tell us about the safety of the Pacific Ocean? Since Chernobyl and Three Mile Island were not near an ocean, how do you know for sure what nuclear fallout does to the ocean? Where does a particle of radioactive plutonium hang out for its first billion years? If it gets inside a salmon and two years later I eat the salmon, will it keep me alive for a billion years? Just asking.

A few years ago the mercury scare taught us how mercury concentrates in tuna as it elevates up the food chain. It is not a difficult leap to understand how nuclear isotopes behaves in a similar manner, potentially concentrating a more deadly punch in a fillet of salmon than in a microscopic plankton.

QUESTION: Christiane, when you assure us gullible readers and viewers that radioactive seawater is not harmful to humans, you mean before it travels up the food chain, right? What about after?

During the 1950s the United States government attempted to educate us dolts about the threat of a Russian atomic bomb. Civil Defense forces in every community warned us citizens of The Big One. As kids, we were drilled on how to dive under our desks at school. Our families were encouraged to build bomb shelters in our basements.

QUESTION: Mr. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, why is there no effort to educate us on the potential threat of the effects of this Japanese blowout? If the Fukushima complex were to hit “criticality” (that is what you call it, right?) would an atomic chain reaction blow hundreds of tons of radioactive material high into the atmosphere? Wouldn’t it rain down all over the northern hemisphere? If a few pounds of plutonium can cause millions of cancer cases, how many cases would ton cause?

Mr. United Nations, Sir, we are numbed by all your assurances that the Fukushima meltdown is only threatening to the people living within the evacuation zone a few miles from the reactors.

QUESTION: What will happen when the Cat scan is finally out of the bag and the evacuation zone includes the northern hemisphere? Should we all evacuate to UN Plaza in New York?

The media might have to speculate on a connection across the Pacific, connecting the dots between a blown up nuclear plant in Japan and radioactive rainwater in California.

I can hear Wolf Blitzer now, “Maybe there is a hypothetical, potential,

unproven, possible, alleged, non collaborated, connection between radioactive milk in Spokane and the cracked containment vessel in Japan.”

QUESTION: Why is the Fukushima Big One any less real or less threatening than a commie attack in the 50’s? What should we do when bubbles of nuclear gas are falling onto our heads? Do we dive under our desks?

To my media friends: you like reporting on the cute, little Iodine isotopes with half lives of a few hours or days. Reporting on premature births of deformed babies in west coast hospitals won’t be as fun.

QUESTION: When the devil’s sperm, namely radioactive plutonium, shows up in American women’s wombs and deformed bodies of American babies, will the devil’s handlers release the news to you and will you tell us?

Until the evening news can show photographs of deformed newborns in America’s maternity wards and roll video of children who are not allowed to go outdoors, the Nuclear Concentration Camp won't be real.

QUESTION: Glenn, how long do you think it will take for the government-science-media cabal to crack and admit that the Fail Safe limit had been breached within the first fews days of the Fukushima explosion?

We’d all like to believe that government officials, scientists, reporters and editors are actual human beings with beating hearts that are capable of experiencing compassion for others.

QUESTION: If this genie can’t be stuck back into the bottle and it kills a few million people, including possibly your own family members and friends, would you feel that you should accept any of the responsibility, the blame, for failing to report what is actually going on?

Mr. Bill, you’ve already cost us four weeks of precious, lost time.

It is precisely in this early stage, when people need accurate, helpful information to prepare themselves for what is potentially coming.

We don’t need your condescending pabulum. What we need is for you to use your giant media machine to help people learn how to defend themselves against nuclear fallout. We want to know how to prepare our bodies to fight the Invasion of the Nuclides.

QUESTION: Why won’t you help direct people to information that can save lives? Why won’t you help people become radiation survivors rather than radiation targets?

We planetary plebs need help. We need vital, life-saving information RIGHT NOW! We watch you strut out pink-clad, cancer survivors at rallies on evening news shows. How about giving us a hand, so that more of us can don the pink armor of victory and attend some of your rallies as Radiation Survivors.

QUESTION: Please, can you urge people to go to RadiationSurvivor.com to find helpful information to reduce their risks of nuclear exposure and to increase their chances of being radiation survivors? Go Pink!

I look forward to your answers. Leave a comment on this page or email me at dan [at] youra[dot]com

Thank you,

Dan

Dan Youra is chairman of the board of JC MASH clinics on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State. He is the editor of The Alcohol Distiller’s Manual for Gasohol and Spirits, managing editor of Current Thought on Peace and War and publisher of ToxGas.com and RadiationSurvivor.com.

Website for Radiation Survival

POSTERS . . . . RadiationSurvivor.com . . . . TEACHING AIDS
The Radiation Survivor website is desinged to empower people with knowledge, information and HOPE that there are things that all of us can do to face the prospects of nuclear fallout head on. Whether the threat is imminent or far off, weak or robust, local or global, contrived or real, I am offering proven, healthy treatments to fight the radiation and win.

I'm building on the five cornerstones of Safety, Attitude, Preparation, Life Style and Treatments. I tie into the facts at ToxGas.com and the social interaction on the BlowOutBlog.

Much of the substance of the site is an explication of Dr. Mark Sircus' work in building up the body's immune system with diet and healthy protocols for cleansing toxins out of the body in order to be able to withstand the onslaught of the nuclear legions.

In the midst of this massive outpouring of radiation from the blownout reactors at Fukushima, and the likely scenario of much more to continue pouring out for years to come, I am guided by the following precepts:

1. There is no such thing as a safe level of nuclear radiation.
2. It is never too early to start preparing the body to fight the radiation.
3. The properly treated body can survive the radiation.

I am trying to offer every bit of hope that I can, hope that the individual can do something to fight this beast on a personal level, hope that a mom and dad can encourage their kids, hope that a teacher can pass on to his or her class, hope that a boss can share with his or her crew. The urgency of this moment is calling us to be healthy, healthier, and the healthiest we can be. If, in the face of the potentially deadly radiation, the survival of the individual is in the balance, and it is, than the highest probability of survival goes to the healthiest body that can fight off the isotopes attacking by land, sea and air.

The website RadiationSurvivor.com is packed with useful information.

Cards

Apparel

Cup

Cards

Nuclear Canary Warns of Radiation

Refresh page to view other pictures of Nuclear Canary


POSTERS . . . . RadiationSurvivor.com . . . . TEACHING AIDS
Dan Youra created the "Canary in the Gulf" to warn residents of toxic gases from the blowout of the BP oil well. Now with the eruption of irradiated fallout coming out of Japan's blownout nuclear reactors, Dan suited up the "Nuclear Canary" to watch for dangerous radiation and help warn the millions of "downwinders" of the threatening clouds of nuclear peril headed their way.

The nuclear radiation chart below is a compilation of educational, scientific and governmental publications. More information at TOXGAS.com. Order products at PRODUCTS. Download aids at DOWNLOAD.

Cards

Apparel

Cup

Cards

Radiation Survivor Chart

POSTERS . . . . RadiationSurvivor.com . . . . TEACHING AIDS
Radiation Survivor Chart is a website with links to resources for personal survival in the face of nuclear radiation.

The nuclear radiation chart is a compilation of educational, scientific and governmental publications. Sometimes they do not agree in detail among themselves. Editorial decisions are necessary to round out the slight discrepancies.

More information at TOXGAS.com. Order products at PRODUCTS. Download aids at DOWNLOAD.

Apparel

Key chain

Cup

Card

Nuclear Fallout: On The Beach

POSTERS . . . . TOXGAS.com . . . . TEACHING AIDS
U Family Fallout is a series of Utoons on nuclear radiation by editorial cartoonist Dan Youra. Second in the series is Nuclear Fallout: On The Beach.

The nuclear radiation chart is a compilation of educational, scientific and governmental publications. Sometimes they do not agree in detail among themselves. Editorial decisions are necessary to round out the slight discrepancies.

More information at TOXGAS.com. Order products at PRODUCTS. Download chart at DOWNLOAD.

Apparel

Key chain

Cup

Card

Nuclear Fallout: Vacation is a Gas

POSTERS . . . . TOXGAS.com . . . . TEACHING AIDS
U Family Fallout is a series of Utoons on nuclear radiation by editorial cartoonist Dan Youra. First in the series is Nuclear Fallout: Vacation is a Gas.

The nuclear radiation chart is a compilation of educational, scientific and governmental publications. Sometimes they do not agree in detail among themselves. Editorial decisions are necessary to round out the slight discrepancies.

More information at TOXGAS.com. Order products at PRODUCTS. Download chart at DOWNLOAD.

Apparel

Key chain

Cup

Card

Your Guide to Radiation Sources and Doses

POSTERS . . . . TOXGAS.com . . . . TEACHING AIDS
Understanding the basics of radiation is not easy. With the media full of news about the failed nuclear power plant at Fukushima Japan, we are all confronted with the daunting challenge of trying to make sense out of what we see on TV and read in newspapers and blogs.

I created this chart Your Guide to Radiation Sources and Doses to provide a quick reference to the comparative intensity of radiation sources and doses. The units of measurement to describe the potency of radiation gets tricky right off the bat. This chart uses both the United States system and the metric system, making it easy to cross check with measurements you see or hear in the media. Rems and millirems are units of radiation used in the United States. Sieverts and millisieverts are units used in the metric system. You see them in the chart right next to each other.

The chart places the most potentially dangerous sources and doses of radiation at the top. At the bottom of the chart are the more common sources of radiation that we all encounter on a regular basis in our daily lives, no matter where we live on the plant.

The chart is a compilation of educational, scientific and governmental publications. Sometimes they do not agree in detail among themselves. Editorial decisions are necessary to round out the slight discrepancies.

More information at TOXGAS.com. Order products at PRODUCTS. Download chart at DOWNLOAD.

Apparel

Key chain

Cup

Card

The Atoms Are Coming!

POSTERS . . . . TOXGAS.com . . . . PRODUCTS

Here is my question: would the government of Japan or US tell us, if they found radioactive isotopes of plutonium in the seawater? They like reporting on iodine isotopes with half lives of a few hours or days. When the devil’s sperm, namely plutonium 239, shows up in the radioactive concoction floating off Fukushima, will his handlers release the news?

More at BlowOutBlog.info

No Such Thing as "Safe" Radiation

There is no safe level of radiation exposure.
Jeff Patterson, former president of Physicians for Social Responsibility

POSTERS        TOXGAS.com      PRODUCTS

It is the inability to see the effects of chronic,
 low level toxicities on human health that has been,
 and remains, our greatest failing as intelligent beings.

Dr. Boyd Haley

MORE QUOTES AT BlowOutBlog.info.

Nuclear Salmon Made in Japan

Tokyo. March 22, 2011. Abnormally high levels of radioactive substances have been detected in seawater near the quake-crippled nuclear power plant in Japan, its operator said early Tuesday, cited by AFP. Five kinds of radioactive materials, including iodine-131, cesium-134 and cobalt, released by damaged fuel rods, were detected in the sea.

Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) said the level of iodine-131 was 126.7 times higher and cesium-134 was 24.8 times higher than government-set standards. Cesium-137 was 16.5 times higher

The government limit is based on the amount of radioactive material that can be consumed by a person for a year, which is 1 millisievert. Although iodine-131 has a radioactive half-life of eight days, cesium-137's half-life is about 30 years.

In a phenomenon called biological concentration, radioactive materials in seawater will become more concentrated in fish and marine plants.

The substances were detected in seawater which was sampled Monday about 100 kilometres (60 miles) south of the Fukushima No.1 plant.

Japan's Nuclear BlowOut

Japan Blowout is an artistic depiction of the global meltdown caused by the cascading problems in Japan. Japan grew in size. Its impact on the rest of the world is earth shaking. The Japan blowout made the Pacific smaller and blew the continents off the planet. Its repercussions are nebulous, undefined, amorphous. The concept of north and south hemispheres is irrelevant. The band of fallout ties in Chernobyl and 3 Mile Island. One giant tear drops from the eyeball-looking hole. TheSaveU.co website teaches You what you can do to Save Yourself and your family in the face of the nuclear blowout.

More at SaveU.co and TOXGAS. Artwork by Dan Youra. More at YouraNews.com.

Order downloads and posters and products.